<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freedom of Speech Goes Pop</title>
	<link>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2006/06/25/freedom-of-speech-goes-pop/</link>
	<description>Not about wood or vegetables</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CuriousHamster</title>
		<link>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2006/06/25/freedom-of-speech-goes-pop/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>CuriousHamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 11:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2006/06/25/freedom-of-speech-goes-pop/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Ah yes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I did look back and found a couple of columnists opinions, like &lt;a HREF="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/columnists/columnists.html?in_article_id=376300&#038;in_page_id=1772&#038;in_author_id=227" REL="nofollow"&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;, before I posted this and just assumed it to be the DM's position. Oops.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for pointing that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes.</p>
<p>I did look back and found a couple of columnists opinions, like <a HREF="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/columnists/columnists.html?in_article_id=376300&#038;in_page_id=1772&#038;in_author_id=227" REL="nofollow">this one</a>, before I posted this and just assumed it to be the DM&#8217;s position. Oops.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osama Saeed</title>
		<link>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2006/06/25/freedom-of-speech-goes-pop/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Osama Saeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 00:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2006/06/25/freedom-of-speech-goes-pop/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Hate to be a party pooper, but the Mail actually said it was irresponsible to print those cartoons at the time - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/newscomment.html?in_article_id=376125&#038;in_page_id=1787&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This will probably be the last time I shall ever defend the Mail. I'm feeling quite ashamed of myself as I write. But stand up for justice and all that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to be a party pooper, but the Mail actually said it was irresponsible to print those cartoons at the time - <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/newscomment.html?in_article_id=376125&#038;in_page_id=1787" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/newscomment.html?in_article_id=376125&#038;in_page_id=1787</a></p>
<p>This will probably be the last time I shall ever defend the Mail. I&#8217;m feeling quite ashamed of myself as I write. But stand up for justice and all that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CuriousHamster</title>
		<link>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2006/06/25/freedom-of-speech-goes-pop/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>CuriousHamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2006/06/25/freedom-of-speech-goes-pop/#comment-156</guid>
		<description>karol, you seem to be conflating two issues there. The first, the one I wrote about, was whether freedom of speech means being able to cause deliberate offence. The DM says yes when talking about Muslim beliefs but no when talking about Thatcher. Hypocrites.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The second issue, the one you wrote about, was the reaction to deliberate offence being caused. This is a seperate issue. In this country, protests against the cartoons were overwhelmingly peaceful (a small minority, perhaps 100 or so, took part in a protest displaying extreme placards). Clearly, rioting and buring cars is not an acceptable way to exercise free speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>karol, you seem to be conflating two issues there. The first, the one I wrote about, was whether freedom of speech means being able to cause deliberate offence. The DM says yes when talking about Muslim beliefs but no when talking about Thatcher. Hypocrites.</p>
<p>The second issue, the one you wrote about, was the reaction to deliberate offence being caused. This is a seperate issue. In this country, protests against the cartoons were overwhelmingly peaceful (a small minority, perhaps 100 or so, took part in a protest displaying extreme placards). Clearly, rioting and buring cars is not an acceptable way to exercise free speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karol</title>
		<link>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2006/06/25/freedom-of-speech-goes-pop/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Karol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2006/06/25/freedom-of-speech-goes-pop/#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Let me know when Mr. Ross riots and burns cars.  Sorry for you that you can't spot the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me know when Mr. Ross riots and burns cars.  Sorry for you that you can&#8217;t spot the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billythekid</title>
		<link>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2006/06/25/freedom-of-speech-goes-pop/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>billythekid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2006/06/25/freedom-of-speech-goes-pop/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>LMFAO it's the double standards normally reserved for the politicians they write about..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMFAO it&#8217;s the double standards normally reserved for the politicians they write about..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
