<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They Hate Our Freedoms</title>
	<link>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2007/09/17/they-hate-our-freedoms-2/</link>
	<description>Not about wood or vegetables</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CuriousHamster</title>
		<link>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2007/09/17/they-hate-our-freedoms-2/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>CuriousHamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2007/09/17/they-hate-our-freedoms-2/#comment-861</guid>
		<description>I suspect a heavy froth, myself.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I'm of the belief that you could cherry pick the BBC's enormous output to "prove" anything you want. For example, last night I was flicking through the channels and &lt;a HREF="http://biased-beeb.blogspot.com/2007/09/brainwashers.html" REL="nofollow"&gt;Songs of Praise&lt;/a&gt; was on BBC One. And they're always bigging up the Royal family in one way or another.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It's  enough to get this anti-hereditary monarchy, atheist leftie frothing, I can tell you. Bloody religious/establishment bias...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In all seriousness, Biased BBC's cherry picking method is inherently flawed. They only see and write about examples which confirm their beliefs. If I sent them examples of "right wing bias" from Top Gear, for example, do you think they would post them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect a heavy froth, myself.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m of the belief that you could cherry pick the BBC&#8217;s enormous output to &#8220;prove&#8221; anything you want. For example, last night I was flicking through the channels and <a HREF="http://biased-beeb.blogspot.com/2007/09/brainwashers.html" REL="nofollow">Songs of Praise</a> was on BBC One. And they&#8217;re always bigging up the Royal family in one way or another.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s  enough to get this anti-hereditary monarchy, atheist leftie frothing, I can tell you. Bloody religious/establishment bias&#8230;</p>
<p>In all seriousness, Biased BBC&#8217;s cherry picking method is inherently flawed. They only see and write about examples which confirm their beliefs. If I sent them examples of &#8220;right wing bias&#8221; from Top Gear, for example, do you think they would post them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Falco</title>
		<link>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2007/09/17/they-hate-our-freedoms-2/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>Falco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2007/09/17/they-hate-our-freedoms-2/#comment-860</guid>
		<description>I do agree that BBBC do go a bit overboard in their critisism to the point where you suspect a light froth must be appearing at the corner of the writer's mouth.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, they also show genuine examples of lefty, collectivist bias which is not too difficult because it's fairly obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree that BBBC do go a bit overboard in their critisism to the point where you suspect a light froth must be appearing at the corner of the writer&#8217;s mouth.</p>
<p>However, they also show genuine examples of lefty, collectivist bias which is not too difficult because it&#8217;s fairly obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
