<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Predetermined Outcomes, Part 2</title>
	<link>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2007/12/13/predetermined-outcomes-part-2/</link>
	<description>Not about wood or vegetables</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Newsnight versus Policy Exchange &#171; pixelisation</title>
		<link>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2007/12/13/predetermined-outcomes-part-2/#comment-1681</link>
		<dc:creator>Newsnight versus Policy Exchange &#171; pixelisation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2007/12/13/predetermined-outcomes-part-2/#comment-1681</guid>
		<description>[...] some analysis of their own. MacEoin&#8217;s own political viewpoints are noted by Garry Smith (1, 2), and a quick search of his name tells you a lot. (Indigo Jo, a keen reader of letters to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] some analysis of their own. MacEoin&#8217;s own political viewpoints are noted by Garry Smith (1, 2), and a quick search of his name tells you a lot. (Indigo Jo, a keen reader of letters to the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scottish Roundup &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fore!</title>
		<link>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2007/12/13/predetermined-outcomes-part-2/#comment-1583</link>
		<dc:creator>Scottish Roundup &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fore!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 02:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2007/12/13/predetermined-outcomes-part-2/#comment-1583</guid>
		<description>[...] on the subject of hateful literature in mosques. Osama Saeed takes a look at the report, while Garry and BookDrunk are exasperated at how the rest of the media simply took Policy Exchange&#8217;s word [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] on the subject of hateful literature in mosques. Osama Saeed takes a look at the report, while Garry and BookDrunk are exasperated at how the rest of the media simply took Policy Exchange&#8217;s word [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just wait till I get out my inkjet &#171; akatsuki ra-ra-ra</title>
		<link>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2007/12/13/predetermined-outcomes-part-2/#comment-1523</link>
		<dc:creator>Just wait till I get out my inkjet &#171; akatsuki ra-ra-ra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2007/12/13/predetermined-outcomes-part-2/#comment-1523</guid>
		<description>[...] 14 December 2007 by akatsukira    What they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 14 December 2007 by akatsukira    What they [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2007/12/13/predetermined-outcomes-part-2/#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sticksandcarrots.net/2007/12/13/predetermined-outcomes-part-2/#comment-1517</guid>
		<description>Good stuff. Dean Godson certainly took an unusual approach, purely playing to the gallery. His “there’s nothing in shariah law about ink jet printers” jibe told you all you needed to know about where he was coming from. What an odious man. Why he didn’t just admit that the Newsnight findings were worrying and would be looked into, but didn’t alter the main thrust of Policy Exchange’s report, I don’t know. Not that it would alter the fact that you can get extremist and offensive literature legally on Amazon and in Waterstone’s; but hey, freedom of speech and all that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff. Dean Godson certainly took an unusual approach, purely playing to the gallery. His “there’s nothing in shariah law about ink jet printers” jibe told you all you needed to know about where he was coming from. What an odious man. Why he didn’t just admit that the Newsnight findings were worrying and would be looked into, but didn’t alter the main thrust of Policy Exchange’s report, I don’t know. Not that it would alter the fact that you can get extremist and offensive literature legally on Amazon and in Waterstone’s; but hey, freedom of speech and all that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
